| 
|  |  | 
 
 |   |  
| 	Search
 
05/10/2013    William A Sachs, DPM
 Letter to Gov. Christie About ESWT Coverage
 
 
 
I recently had a former patient return to see me. I had performed ESWT 10 years ago. She began to
 tell me how great the procedure had been and that
 she has been pain free for all these years. She
 remarked that she heard "it's not covered
 anymore" and she's so happy she was able to have
 it covered at that time because it really "made a
 difference" in her life. It prompted me to write
 this letter to Governor Christie. My hope is that
 others will take the time to write a letter to
 their government officials in the hope that there
 may be some transparency and maybe some action
 taken to allow us to better serve our patients.
 
 Dear Governor Christie,
 
 I have been in practice for 30 years, and during
 that time, insurance reimbursement has declined
 more than 50%, while inflation, supply costs,
 office salaries, rent and liability insurance
 have continued to rise.
 
 Can you imagine if salaries to government workers
 would have steadily declined during that period
 of time? I’m sure the quality of government
 employee and government services would decline,
 or stop altogether!
 
 One issue I wish to bring to your attention is
 the policy of insurance companies to decline
 services which are cutting edge and allow people
 to recover faster without significant side-
 effects or disability.
 
 I would hope this would pique your interest
 because these procedures are minimally invasive
 and allow patients to get back to work sooner.
 This allows for less time out of work and less
 time collecting disability!
 
 The procedures I refer to are called ESWT
 (extracorporeal shockwave therapy) and PRP
 (platelet rich plasma). They are used for chronic
 tendonitis, including plantar fasciitis and
 Achilles tendonitis. These procedures are
 extremely effective, have been in use for more
 than 10 years and are FDA-approved.
 
 Ironically, Horizon Blue Cross covered these
 services 10 years ago but then decided they are,
 in their terms “experimental and
 investigational”. Or in the simplest of terms….
 Too many people are opting for this simple
 solution and it is having an adverse effect on
 our bottom line! There is nothing experimental or
 investigational about it. They are FDA-approved
 procedures with thousands of patients that are
 now pain free.
 
 I appreciate that you are a no “BS” guy. But the
 policies of these insurance carriers are
 pure “BS”. Patients pay exorbitant premiums for
 what they think is the ability to have quality
 healthcare. This includes having accessibility to
 the best trained doctors utilizing the latest and
 most effective treatment modalities. Clearly,
 these opportunities are not always available due
 to the insurance company’s bottom line.
 
 I am hoping this may shed some light on a very
 frustrating state of affairs. I realize this may
 be a very small part of the problem but your
 attention would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thank you for your attention.
 
 Respectfully,
 
 William A Sachs, DPM, Toms River, NJ,
 wmasachs@gmail.com
 
  There are no more messages in this thread. |  |  |   |  |