|
|
|
|
Search
06/05/2026 David Freedman, DPM
Recouped Payments from CMS
I am concerned because I am continuously getting letters from CMS saying that they are recouping payments. At first it was just one or two here or there and for amounts less than 50$ but now I am receiving several of them a day and they are really adding up! I asked my biller and she said, "This issue is currently affecting all providers who bill with POS 31 (Skilled Nursing Facility) and POS 32 (Nursing Facility). Medicare keeps its own records to determine a patient’s status, and we bill using the POS Medicare has on file at the time the claim is submitted. The problem is that Medicare often updates patient status after claims have already been processed and paid. For example, a claim might be paid under POS 32 with a higher reimbursement, but if Medicare later changes the status to POS 31, they will take back the difference. This results in the overpayment letters you are receiving.
Unfortunately, this is a widespread Medicare issue and is beyond our control. Our team has researched this thoroughly, and there is currently no way to prevent these retroactive adjustments." Is there any recourse here?
PM News Subscriber
Response from Codinghelpline.com: The simple answer is that there is likely little recourse. Providers furnishing services in a nursing facility are responsible for determining the patient's correct status and billing the appropriate Place of Service (POS)—either POS 31 (Skilled Nursing Facility) or POS 32 (Nursing Facility).
CMS places responsibility on the billing provider to report the correct POS. Because providers often do not have direct access to a facility's SNF census, best practice is to obtain and retain documentation from the facility—such as a face sheet, census report, or Part A status report— confirming whether the patient was in a Medicare Part A SNF stay on the date of service.
Medicare reimburses differently based on POS. The OIG found that practitioners frequently billed POS 32 instead of POS 31 for patients who were actually in a Part A SNF stay. Since POS 32 is paid at a higher rate, this resulted in significant Medicare overpayments. CMS subsequently implemented edits and directed MACs to identify and recoup these overpayments.
To reduce the risk of future recoupments, providers should:
• Obtain a weekly or monthly census identifying Part A residents. • Verify each patient's status on the date of service. • Retain supporting facility documentation for audit purposes. • Bill POS 31 for Part A SNF residents and POS 32 for long-term care/non-Part A residents.
David Freedman, DPM, Silver Spring, MD
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|