


|
|
|
|
|
Search
05/11/2026 Samuel Makanjuola, DPM, MEd
The Case for a Plenary License
I know this was brought up before, but I think we as a profession have to address it. Scope of practice is all over the place for different states; this isn't unheard of even in other MD/DO specialties. That being said, the limited scope really does significantly affect practice. More importantly it affects patients and the care they receive.
A few examples come to mind. Recently, I had someone come see me for "gout" - this is something I could technically treat; but can I? If I give colchicine for the acute phase, I think most would agree that that's the correct course of treatment. This patient however had gout of the wrist, and didn't realize he scheduled with a podiatrist. Now the location doesn't change the pathology and, again, technically I could prescribe colchicine for said acute phase. But isn't this now outside of my scope? Furthermore, if he needed long term management and I put him on allopurinol would that be within scope? Even if his gout was never in his lower extremity?
Or take the case of the pediatric patient I just saw. Warts, everywhere - except his foot. The worst ones were on his hands. Technically, in my state we have "superficial hand privileges" yet no one has really specified what that means. Should I treat his hand warts? With what? Should I treat his hand warts yet send him out for the arm warts and the trunk warts? Now make no mistake I'm not necessarily saying I want to treat upper extremity pathology, not at all tbh. But my first thought went to cimetidine and h2 antagonists that help with warts of this nature. But can I prescribe cimetidine? Especially for warts that are again, elsewhere other than the foot?
I remember reading that many podiatrists didn't feel comfortable prescribing and managing even gabapentin, despite the fact that peripheral neuropathy is mostly in the legs and feet! So at this point we have to ask, as someone pointed out before: did we do ourselves a disservice by not focusing just as much on the medicine as the surgery and more importantly by not pushing for that to be enshrined in scope of practice laws?
Would a plenary license solve these issues where I was taught what would help, I know how to help, I could help, but I don't want any legal problems? For the record I don't think tying the DPM degree to an MD/DO degree would be the right way to accomplish this. I'm frankly astonished that in this day and age, especially with the chaos at all levels of government, that we can't pass a bill solidifying our scope and granting plenary privileges.
Do better podiatry. Do better. Plenary license. Standardized scope. Equal pay for equal work from insurances. These are floor level requirements I was promised almost 10 years ago when starting this journey that never materialized. Then y'all have the nerve to ask why people don't want to go into podiatry.
Samuel Makanjuola, DPM, MEd, Columbus, OH
Other messages in this thread:
05/12/2026 Robert Kornfeld, DPM
The Case for a Plenary License (Samuel Makanjuola, DPM, MEd)
Dr. Samuel Makanjuola brings up a decades old issue. It’s not just the 10 years he has been in practice. It’s the almost 46 years since I graduated NYCPM. But here is what is interesting about podiatry. When we prescribe NSAIDs, are we treating the foot? No we are not. We are treating the immune system. Same when we prescribe steroids. When we prescribe narcotic analgesics, are we treating the foot? No we are not. We are treating the CNS. I can site many more examples. Of course, we can only do these things in relation to podiatric pathology, but we are absolutely allowed, on a legal level, to treat systemically in order to address the pathology we are licensed to treat.
We’ve been halfway there for decades. Yet, the people we have appointed for all of these years as the spokespersons of this profession seem to have only been able to keep us stuck. So I took a different track. If I’m licensed to suppress the CNS, the immune system, alter the microbiome with antibiotics, and all the other ways we’re licensed to treat systemically, then I am also licensed to support the immune system, the CNS, the microbiome, etc. as long as I do it to treat podiatric pathology.
My point is that you cannot separate the foot from the human body. It is an integral part of all the systems that keep us alive and functional. Podiatry made a GRAVE error by focusing on surgery. I knew it then. Time has proven me right. We have become technicians of the surgical approach to foot and ankle pathology. As such, the argument for a plenary license becomes moot. Our residents should be, need to be, learning all the systems of the human body and how they affect immune function when out of balance because that is why people cross the morbidity threshold and become our patients.
We need to go back and reassess how we train our young, aspiring podiatrists. The mistake we have to address is definitely fixable. But in order to fix it, we have to confront the pink elephant in the room. This profession has lacked pride for as long as I have practiced. Many podiatrists refuse to call themselves podiatrists. They are “foot and ankle surgeons”. They have shame about who they are. They don’t really know medicine in the way they need to know it. But yes, they are highly trained and very skilled surgeons.
Despite this, we are still called upon to practice podiatric MEDICINE. And unless your patients can drop off their feet on Tuesday, leave them for repairs and pick them up on Wednesday, we will be treating whole persons, not feet.
Specializing should NOT mean ignoring the patient and the systemic underlying mechanisms those feet are attached to. Come on podiatry. It’s time. Start by learning functional medicine. Optimize your patient so you can heal, not just treat, their pathology. You are physicians. Let’s get trained like physicians.
Let’s reassess our approach to training our residents. When we train like physicians, the path to a plenary license will become way more inviting and far more attainable. Robert Kornfeld, DPM, NY, NY
|
| |
|
|
|