|
|
|
|
Search
01/12/2026 Paul Kesselman, DPM
CMS Withdraws BOC’s Status as an Accrediting Organization (AO) (Michaela Crawford, DPM)
Dr. Crawford brings up an issue which, while interesting is insignificant for most physicians (MD/DO/DPM) who provide DME to their own patients. Space in this forum only allows me to touch on the highlights of this issue and there is much more than what is presented below.
Let me set the record straight so that most if not all DPMs reading this DO NOT PANIC and understand they are NOT required to undergo Facility Accreditation by an accreditation organization unless they voluntarily want to. Most other DME providers, including but not limited to pedorthists, wound care suppliers and your local neighborhood DME brick and inventory store, require Facility Accreditation by an accredited organization.
Let me repeat, physicians are exempt and do not require facility accreditation when providing DME as an ancillary service to their OWN patients. Those last two words are key. If you are filling prescriptions from other physicians, and you are not performing a physician evaluation and management service, which establishes the need for a DME items, but rather simply filling an order/or prescription from another provider outside your practice, then you are not providing DME as an ancillary service. Under those rare circumstances you would be required to have your facility accredited by one of several Accreditation Organizations (AO).
If on the other hand ,you are the ordering/prescribing physician and dispensing DME to your own patients, you can sit back and relax. There is nothing more you need to do, but become a bit more educated on this issue, but to repeat, no other action is required, unless you want to voluntarily spend thousands of dollars to have an AO tell you how to conduct your practice. This is not my opinion but is factual as engraved in the Medicare Modernization and Improvement Act (MIPPA 2008)
Facility Accreditation is a very separate issue from DME inspections and revalidation which is a triennial event. CMS in their recent attempt to crack down on fraud in the DME world is attempting to have DME suppliers who require Facility Accreditation to have that renewed by an AO on an annual basis. And yes, this, as Dr. Crawford points out, is a rather expensive process. This annual review as one can imagine is receiving significant rebuttal in the DME world, especially since the BOC Accreditation was revoked by CMS.
The background story here is that one of the accreditation organizations, specifically BOC, had their status as an AO revoked because one of their inspectors was taking bribes to pass DME facilities or was double dipping and setting up bogus facilities in their own name and then providing them with Facility Accreditation so those organizations could bill Medicare.
As far as which AO Dr. Crawford’s separate entity should be contracted, Dr. Crawford should refer to the AO list provided on the CMS website, as within this forum it would be unethical to endorse one AO over another.
Lastly, there are Stark and Anti-Incentive Issues which will need to be navigated if Dr. Crawford, the physician, refers patients to the separate DME entity that Dr. Crawford owns or has significant ownership in. There are also state licensing and tax issues (both State and County) issues which Dr. Crawford will need to navigate and an attorney and accountant both well versed in these subjects should be consulted.
Pauli Kesselman, DPM, Oceanside, NY
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|