


|
|
|
|
|
Search
11/25/2025 Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD
De-Extinction (John S. Steinberg, DPM)
John, thank you from the bottom of my, everyone else’s, presumed dark and nefarious heart. I will shock you by telling you that we are very, very close to feeling the same way about podiatry. The profession has been wonderful to us, our families and the public, especially those facing an amputation because a wound was mismanaged or not managed at all.
I was not exuberant about private practice for the singular reason that I was alone. When an exceptional case presented and the x-rays viewed, I’d look at them and say, “Wow, look at this!” and there was no one to share my excitement with. I entered academia after less than seven years in private practice to teach at Des Moines which was one of the best decisions of my life. I looked forward to every day as I did at Ohio State and breaking a glass ceiling in Columbus and furthering the profession in unchartered waters.
John, I am afraid that all the DO schools opening will lure podiatry capable students away from our DPM to a DO degree. This new generation is adamant about the change in degree as shown in the PM News survey (FACT). They want to be able or at least have the capability to prescribe medications not targeted solely to foot pathology. The idea is hypnotic and seductive to the Z and Alpha Generations, and we are losing potential DPMs as witnessed by the dwindling enrollment in podiatry schools (FACT). I asked my ophthalmologist, Squints Jones, if he ever prescribed a systemic medication for any of his patients. He said he didn’t. When we talked a bit about the idea of a plenary license for podiatrists, he agreed the new initials would be nice, but he, himself could have functioned as he had been for the last 30 years with an MD license limited to the eye.
It looks that saving our profession is going to require some forward thinking and pre-emptive moves on our part. I fear status quo won’t make it and as stubborn as podiatry is, we need to compromise, a decision that doesn’t please anyone 100%. The ultimate question and answer seems very basic to me. Would we rather have a podiatry profession with different initials (DO) but adhering to the noble ideals and goals of our current initials (DPM)? That’s the compromise. Should we give the next generation what they want (DO degree and plenary license) to preserve what we want (preserving podiatry).
Where we don’t agree is the salary issue. Your numbers of $440,00 and $300,000 remunerations differ greatly from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics where the mean annual wage for podiatrists was $162,000 in 2023 (FACT). I was never brought up to judge a profession’s desirability solely on what the compensation would be. I’d like to think podiatrists inflate income to other DPMs but never lie to the government.
Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD, Columbus, OH
Other messages in this thread:
12/01/2025 H. David Gottlieb, DPM
De-Extinction (John S. Steinberg, DPM)
Beginning with the early years of PM News there have been naysayers lamenting the demise of the podiatric profession. At one time, I was one of them. On this Thanksgiving evening, I am thankful that all the gloom and doom has been for naught.
As Dr. John Steinberg, and others, have pointed out our graduating residents work in every practice setting there is: independent, group single-specialty, multi-specialty, as part of orthopedic practices, hospital, clinic, and others as befit their training and desired setting. They command high salaries, even those who opt for nursing home centered care. They also chair committees where they work and/or play. There are podiatrists at the highest levels of healthcare organizations and hospitals.
So I ask, who, exactly, ARE the stakeholders in podiatry? Certainly all the alphabet-labeled organizations hold a stake in our future, but there are others too. The public has a stake in the future of podiatry but they don't seem to have a seat at the table of organized medicine, whether allopathic [which is the medical/surgical style that podiatry belongs to] or osteopathic. Health insurance companies have a stake in the whole of health care as that's where their profit comes from. State and national governments also have a stake in podiatry since we provide much needed lower extremity care in all its forms to their citizens.
Last and not at all the least, is the practicing podiatrist who have a vested stake in the growth and future success of podiatry. These, and ones I may have left out, all have a stake in podiatry. I believe that they all have a legitimate right to shout out about our successes and even our problems. They are the ones who live the issues we discuss here and among our own groups and associates.
H. David Gottlieb, DPM, Baltimore, MD
|
| |
|
|
|