|
|
|
|
Search
10/29/2025 Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD
Podiatry and Manifest Destiny
Is the practice of podiatry exclusively our turf? After seven, maybe eight long years should everything about the diagnosis and treatment of foot pathology belong to podiatrists? Orthopedic surgeons spend a year fellowship learning about the foot pathology, mostly trauma or maybe deformities and lay claim to a right of first refusal for all things foot. If the pathology is “clean” and they have hospital administration in their pocket, there’s a good chance patients coming through the emergency department will never see a podiatrist. Ulcerated, infected, malodorous feet may see an NP in the orthopedic surgeon’s office, but the orthopedic surgeon doesn’t want to contaminate and infect a clean patient by seeing the diabetic on the verge of becoming a non- infected amputee. But podiatrists have fought for care of the global foot here in the United States and have slowly managed to gain entrance to the complete spectrum of foot care. This includes forefoot, rearfoot and ankle, walk-in or trauma, infected or clean. After all, as Carly Simon sang, “Nobody Does it Better.” Or don’t we?
To be fair, let’s examine what’s happened to orthopedic surgery. Little by little the body parts have been chopped up and the orthopedic surgeon has had to fight for bones and joints like never before. Neurosurgeons have laid at least partial claim to the spine. Plastic surgeons assert hand surgery is to delicate for the “bigger mallet, please” orthopedic surgeons. Physiatrists are successfully injecting hyaluronic acid into arthritic knees and hips delaying or even obviating joint replacement surgery.
Many orthopedic sports medicine physicians are losing patients to a family practice physician with a one year sports medicine fellowship. What makes us think orthopedic surgery is just going to cede the foot and ankle to a bunch of doctors who didn’t sit for USMLE or have their residencies or fellowships approved by ACGME, but rather the same agency that accredits what some would call a questionable undergraduate program? Even the kids who go to class in the Caribbean wearing flip- flops, shorts and T-shirts have to contend with ACGME and USMLE. If podiatry tells allopathic and osteopathic medicine they don’t need the outside accreditation everyone else agrees to, podiatry becomes the softest of targets in a now target rich environment. Podiatry has become the Fokker bi-plane being hunted by an F-35 Lightning. There simply is no doubt who will become the winner of that combat scenario.
What makes the allegory more literal and symbolic is that the keepers of the accreditation key, ACGME has offered to investigate making the fight a fairer encounter. We think we are the one in a million David and Goliath story. Or do we? Maybe CPME has secret stones to use in the battle but aren’t telling anyone and no one knows about it except their small secret insiders. And this begs the question, should there be any secrets between the podiatry residencies, AACPM, CPME, podiatric COTH, and the private practice APMA members? I just can’t imagine anything so nefarious and threatening to the profession that the reason for not inviting ACGME to sit down with us is something we are not being told for our own good. Hopefully they might be able to suggest points where we could improve our residencies so that “Nobody does it better!” is true.
We aren’t a profession that can choose a body part to concentrate on. We already have the foot. So, we know from a questionable survey that some individuals want to keep their “NO” votes Secret Squirrel hush-hush. I’ve played those games in podiatry school where suddenly we needed to pass a never mentioned before oral exam to graduate or a surgery teacher gives an exam on material never covered in class so he can find out what we didn’t know, and the Dean had a doctorate in Russian history. The only honest guy was a fellow named Dr. Bennie Lee Owens. We survived those scandals which makes me believe there’s nothing all these alphabet organizations are going to throw at me and send me over the edge.
Let’s suppose ACGME finds some residencies sub-par compared to other residencies. That’s probably closer to the truth than any other lame reason, but the reason for keeping it secret is there is money involved and fear that if a program is closed somebody loses some cash. Well, that may not be the case since we aren’t asking ACGME to suddenly take over for CPME. ACGME may be loaded with real educators who want to make the programs better and aren’t interested in taking away anybody’s stipend. To me that’s greed and that position is the type of position that endangers the whole profession.
You know and I know there are some programs just dangling out there and probably shouldn’t be accredited programs. We needed those programs when we had a lot more graduates. Schools actually advertise 100% residency placement like it’s an accomplishment. Let’s advertise how many graduates of each school match to their first or second choice.
There has to be some programs weaker than others, just like all thirty students who graduate from a particular podiatry college are all tied for valedictorian. Somebody has to be at the bottom of the class. I agree that some podiatrists are the best at foot and ankle but not everyone that graduates a residency program is automatically the best. Some of our podiatry residency graduates may be less prepared to do what we do than some MD or DO orthopedic surgeons who finish a one year foot and ankle fellowship. ACGME is willing to help us change that if we let them rather than keep secrets. To go around blowing our horn that “Nobody Does it Better” is wrong. To not get help for those young podiatrists is worse on the part of COTH, CPME and the other co-conspirators. Remember, Carly Simon also recorded, “You’re so Vain.”
Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD, Columbus, OH
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|