|
|
|
|
Search
10/27/2025 Robert Kornfeld, DPM
Sacred Myths (Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD)
I believe Dr. Tomczak has hit more than one nail on the head here. While a trauma-based fellowship may make sense for some, and I do believe it is something that is needed, I do not think it would be the draw for many and shouldn't be something that we push our graduates into. One of the things I have witnessed in my more than 40-year career is the loss of podiatric medicine from our residencies. Don't get me wrong. I do believe we need to be good surgeons. I did thousands of procedures in my career.
But just look at how things have evolved in our profession. The better the surgical training for our residents became and the more we were pushing well-trained, surgically oriented podiatrists into society, insurance companies lost their respect for surgeons and slashed fees to the point of absurdity. And if that is how a podiatrist is expecting to earn his or her living, it is going to be a struggle going forward.
At the same time, I have come up against some very disturbing experiences in the last 10 or so years. I happen to specialize in chronic foot and ankle pain and work from a functional medicine/regenerative medicine perspective. Many, if not most, of my patients have already seen a number of podiatrists before finding me. And the stories I hear are very upsetting. Patients who were never touched. No exam. No work-up. Just an x-ray and a recommendation for surgery. Many of my patients have had surgery...some have had many surgeries to correct the same problem by different podiatrists. Each one failed. Very few had a legitimate biomechanical evaluation, or any. Many were never given orthotics, or if they were, they are OTC devices you can buy from Amazon.
I saw a patient for a second opinion. The first podiatrist recommended a 5th metatarsal osteotomy for a painful lesion sub 5th met head. As I inspected her foot, there was a rather large lesion in the area. I asked her when she saw the other podiatrist (thinking it was quite a while ago because the lesion was quite thick). She said last week. I asked her if the prior podiatrist trimmed the lesion. The answer was no. And there was no biomechanical evaluation. And again, this doctor did not touch the patient. As is my habit from my training, I began debriding the lesion. As I got through the superficial part of the callus, I felt a clicking under my scalpel. It was a piece of glass. The patient then remembered breaking a glass in her kitchen and getting glass in the foot. She thought she got it all out. I removed the glass fragment. Problem solved.
I also had a patient (a runner) who was suffering from pain in the 1st MTP joint. A fusion was recommended by two other podiatrists. Passive ROM was restricted to about 45 degrees of dorsiflexion. The 1st ray was profoundly hypermobile. No orthotic was recommended to this patient. Just surgery. I put the patient in a custom orthotic with a 1st ray cut out. About 75% of the discomfort was resolved. To work toward getting him asymptomatic, I gave him an HA injection followed 2 weeks later by an RPA injection. He has been asymptomatic since then (7 months now). And is running long distances again.
IMO, we need to return to medical management. Obviously, if conservative management does not succeed, surgery can always be done. But podiatry has fooled itself into thinking we would achieve more respect from the MD/DO world if we became super surgeons (sacred myth) and we could achieve payment parity with MDs and DOs. That definitely has not happened. And when a surgery fails, it's imperative that we examine why it failed. Not just from a procedural failure point of view. But from an immune system perspective. I understand the first surgeon. I can even understand the second. But the third surgeon needs to ask why these prior surgeries failed. It's usually not a surgical problem. It's an immune efficiency problem where repair dynamics are less than desirable.
Finally, I agree (and I never did before) that the D.P.M. degree needs to be retired. It's time we merged our specialty into MD and DO programs so future podiatrists won't be embarrassed to call themselves podiatrists. And that is obvious when you go to LinkedIn and see that very few podiatrists call themselves podiatrists. They are foot surgeons or foot and ankle surgeons.
I can honestly say I owe a lot to the practice of podiatric medicine and surgery. It provided me with a degree to create a beautiful and successful life. But I do not feel I owe my thanks to a profession that has chronically mishandled our challenges. And too many young podiatrists have shared with me that they were told in residency that they would never survive without PE employment. That is totally untrue and unfair.
I graduated in 1980, and in all of my years as a podiatrist, I do not believe we have solved most of the problems we faced way back then and sadly, we have created others that have not served us well. And now we have come to the point where we speak about the extinction of podiatry. That would be a great loss to medicine.
Robert Kornfeld, DPM, New York, NY
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|