


|
|
|
|
Search
07/17/2025 Allen M. Jacobs, DPM
Is This a Stark Law Violation? (Scott T Grodman, DPM)
My patients have overwhelming benefitted from the utilization of EBM products for a variety of pathologies and have done so for many years now. The EBM working model is a variation of that already utilized for those who dispense needed products from their office. Typically, with non- EBM products you purchase an inventory for the office and dispense from that inventory when appropriate for patient care. You likely charge the patient a fee for that product in excess of your cost, thus creating a profit.
You engage in a similar but more beneficial relationship with EBM. First, you purchase no inventory and make no investment. They act as your inventory so to speak. If you prescribe a product, they dispense that product to the patient. The price for dispensing is determined by you alone. You may elect to charge only the cost of the product in which case there is no profit for you. Or you may elect to dispense the product at a price determined by you, which would include your profit. EBM charges the actual cost of the product, and in addition will collect any profit you have added to that, which is immediately forwarded to you.
Another advantage of EBM is that the products cover a wide variety of pathologic conditions which we see daily. It is not just products for neuropathy, pain, dermatologic disorders, plantar fasciitis, plantar, fibromatosis, wound care, but rather a variety of useful products. I would estimate that approximately 50% of my patience are prescribed EBM products at one time or another.
For various conditions, they offer multiple product options. When you purchase inventory, you feel compelled to move that inventory, intend to restrict treatment to the products which you have purchased. With EBM, you have your choice of several different products for each condition and therefore you are not restricted to the old “if all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail” philosophy of dispensing to move your inventory.
The most important aspect of this all is that over many years I have found their products to be extremely effective. Patient benefit greatly from a clinical perspective.
Additionally, the revenue which you can generate by having a variety of products available to dispense for a variety of pathologic states is very beneficial financially. All of this with no cash out or commitments whatsoever.
PM magazine addresses the business of podiatry. I am not a business expert, but I know the benefits that these products have brought to me financially. In my opinion, it is a perfect model for legitimate prescribing and dispensing of products.
I am not employed by EBM. I have lectured several times in the past and endorse their products based upon my experience with them. There are no kickbacks. There are no inducements for use of their products. It is a convenient way and effective means to dispense products which you are already doing.
Allen M. Jacobs, DPM, St. Louis, MO
Other messages in this thread:
07/17/2025 George A. Cioe
Is This a Stark Law Violation? (Scott T Grodman, DPM)
Short Answer: While the Stark Law may not directly apply due to the lack of Medicare reimbursement for the compounds in question, EBM Medical’s reimbursement model may violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, state laws, and podiatric ethical guidelines, including those set forth by the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA).
Legal Considerations
1. Stark Law (42 U.S.C. § 1395nn) The Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients for "designated health services" to entities with which they or immediate family members have a financial relationship—unless an exception applies.
• Limitation: Since the compounds offered by EBM Medical are not covered by Medicare, and physicians are paid directly by patients, Stark Law does not directly apply to this arrangement. 2. Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a–7b) The federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) prohibits offering, soliciting, or receiving any remuneration to induce or reward referrals for services reimbursed by federal healthcare programs.
• Even if patients are paying out of pocket, if any federal reimbursement is involved (e.g., for other services) or if the payment influences prescribing behavior, it may violate AKS.
• This is a criminal statute with significant penalties, and intent is key.
3. Michigan State Law
Michigan’s Health Care False Claim Act (MCL 752.1001 et seq.) and other state-level professional conduct rules may apply more broadly to arrangements where physicians are financially incentivized to steer patient care.
Medical Ethics and APMA Standards
The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) provides ethical guidance in its Code of Ethics, especially under:
Article III – Professional Relationships
“The podiatric physician shall not accept rebates or other inducements for referrals, and shall not offer such inducements to others.”
This directly speaks to the risk inherent in a compensation model where EBM reimburses podiatrists based on prescriptions or referrals.
Article IV – Professional Fees
“The podiatric physician shall not engage in fee- splitting, or accept rebates in any form for patient referrals.”
If EBM Medical’s payments are tied to the volume or nature of prescriptions, this could be considered fee-splitting or rebating, both of which are expressly prohibited by APMA ethical rules.
Conclusion and Recommendation
While Stark Law may not be the applicable statute, the Anti-Kickback Statute, state law, and APMA ethical codes all raise red flags regarding the legality and propriety of participating in EBM Medical’s reimbursement program. Dr. Grodman should consult with legal counsel and a compliance officer before engaging with EBM Medical, to ensure full alignment with:
· Federal and state law, · The APMA Code of Ethics, · His fiduciary duty to patients.
Such arrangements must not compromise clinical judgment or appear to prioritize financial gain over ethical patient care.
George A. Cioe, President and CEO, The Tetra Corporation
07/14/2025 Joseph Borreggine, DPM
Is This a Stark Law Violation? (Scott T Grodman, DPM)
The following is posted on EBM’s Website http://podiatrym.com/go.cfm?n=14647
Why is EBM Medical’s business model not implicated by Anti-Kickback Statutes or Stark Laws? The Anti-Kickback Statute [42 U.S.C. § 1320a- 7b(b)] prohibits the knowing and willful payment of “remuneration” to induce or reward patient referrals or the generation of business involving any item or service payable by the Federal healthcare programs (e.g., drugs, supplies, or health care services for Medicare or Medicaid patients). Similarly, the Physician Self-Referral Law, commonly referred to as the Stark law [42 U.S.C. § 1395nn], prohibits physicians from referring patients to receive “designated health services” payable by Medicare or Medicaid from entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies.
In both instances, the application of the Anti- Kickback Statute and the Stark Law is predicated on a health service that is covered and reimbursed by a federal healthcare program. Because the products available through EBM Medical’s proprietary software platform are not covered by federal healthcare program and EBM Medical does not receive any payments from federal healthcare programs, EBM Medical’s business model does not implicate federal healthcare fraud and abuse laws, as EBM Medical does not provide services to Federal program patients. All products and therapies available using EBM Medical’s software platform are “cash-only.”
EBM Medical takes proactive steps to ensure that every product offered through the EBM Medical software platform is not reimbursed, and cannot be reimbursed, by any federal, state, military, or private insurance. An additional reason EBM Medical’s business model is not implicated by Anti-Kickback Statutes or Stark Laws is because EBM Medical does not make any payment of “remuneration” to induce or reward patient referrals. EBM Medical sells products to providers at a wholesale price, and those providers independently decide to resale those products to patients at a retail price which the provider, not EBM Medical, sets. EBM Medical does not offer any rebates, payments, commissions, bonuses, or split- fee arrangements to providers, patients, pharmacies, or suppliers to utilize EBM Medical’s software platform or otherwise to induce or reward patient referrals.”
Joseph Borreggine, DPM, Fort Myers, FL
|
|
|
|
|