


|
|
|
|
Search
04/16/2025 Jim Shipley, DPM
OIG and Potential Abuse by Medicare Part C Plans and Lower Extremity Revascularization Procedures
I just wanted to respond to the posts regarding LE revascularization procedures performed by Interventional Cardiologists and Radiologists. Half of the practices I'm privileged to be associated with reside in rural communities. Every time that we needed to refer to vascular for a consult, and hopefully revascularization, our patients were put on a 6+ month waitlist that almost always seemed to end up in BK amputations with no revascularization even attempted.
This is their profession and not mine and so I don't desire to pass judgment on them. However, a few years ago we were approached and asked to provide referrals to an interventional cardiologist and radiologist team. Even though we were nervous at first, we quickly learned the benefits of having them as a consult and revascularization source. They do superb work for my patients and quite honestly are still too conservative in their surgical approach then I would like. They fill my inbox with before and after photos which is still nothing compared to the eyewitness results we see with our patients and their wound healing.
I have no affiliation with them but I am extremely glad they exist and so are my patients. I highly recommend that all DPMs search out these professionals in their local areas and begin researching them as a possible consult and procedure source.
Jim Shipley, DPM, Mount Airy, NC
Other messages in this thread:
04/18/2025 Allen M. Jacobs, DPM
OIG and Potential Abuse by Medicare Part C Plans and Lower Extremity Revascularization Procedures (Paul Kesselman, DPM)
Dr. Kesselman has offered a concern and has advised precaution in referrals to interventional radiologists, interventional cardiologists, and vascular surgeons. My experience over the last 2 years would support his warning. I have had the occasion to review multiple litigation scenarios in which a podiatrist has been named in a suit, rightfully or wrongly, for alleged inappropriate referral to interventionalists.
In some circumstances, podiatrists have entered into co-investment agreements with free-standing cath labs, somewhat similar in structure to that typically constructed with surgical centers. At least one national chain of such cath labs, offering stock and investment opportunity for the podiatrist, has come under federal investigation. Lawyers are aware that the podiatrist stands to benefit financially with increased use if the cath lab facility. Typically, the podiatrist is encouraged to refer the patient for arterial or venous studies, following which a decision regarding the need for invasive therapies is determined.
In one case, the patient was referred with no documented compelling evidence of PAD. Nevertheless, the interventionalist determined that a percutaneous procedure was necessary, and unfortunately the patient sustained a serious injury due to complications in performing the procedure. The podiatrist was sued on the basis the he had known or should have known there was no evidence of PAD, and a series of similar referrals became evident. The financial benefit to the podiatrist acting in this manner became all too evident.
Increasingly, I have evaluated cases in which a podiatrist is accused to making an inappropriate referral to interventional radiology or interventional cardiology rather than vascular surgery. Although not common, there is some animosity between some vascular surgeons against interventional cardiology and interventional radiology with regard to peripheral work. The situation reminds me of the occasional orthopedic surgeon who is always critical of any surgery performed by a podiatrist. This critique is particularly evident with interventional radiology, with the argument that PAD does not exist in a vacuum, and generally more than a stent or angioplasty is required to manage the patient, and that interventional radiologists lack the education and skill to totally manage the patients need (eg: medications for PAD or concurrent comorbidities).
With reference to interventional cardiology, some vascular surgeons argue that patients are subjected to percutaneous procedures when an open procedure, eg bypass, was indicated. I have evaluated several cases in which the podiatrist was sued for not referring to vascular surgery in preference to an interventionalist. You may not agree, but as they say "it is what it is". Radiologists, cardiologists, and vascular surgeons differ in their knowledge, training, experience, and capabilities. Your obligation on referral is first and foremost to protect the patient. You should have a reasonable understanding of the competency of any health care provider to whom you refer, including those for management of PAD.
Finally, be observant in following patients following percutaneous or open vascular procedures. The argument that "it's not my job" sound uncaring to a jury. Stents can fracture, re- stenosis can occur, embolization can occur, any number of complications may present following vascular procedures. Sudden changes in Rutherford status, worsening of a wound, increasing signs of ischemia, should be noted and the patient referred back to the vascular surgeon or intervetionalist. Once again, I have reviewed lost leg cases in which the allegation against the podiatrist has been failure to react to changing clinical signs and symptoms which were in hindsight possibly associated with vascular procedure failure or complication.
There is a reason that a closer association has developed over the years between vascular surgeons, interventional cardiologists, and podiatrists. Podiatry represents a significant potential referral source to these specialists. Increasingly, we lecture at their meeting and they at ours. We have a mutual interest: limb salvage and/or prevention of serious complications from arterial and venous and lymphatic disorders. However, with that comes an increasing responsibility to our patients that we must, as Dr. Kesselman intimated, seriously address.
Allen M. Jacobs, DPM, St. Louis, MO
|
|
|
|
|