|
|
|
Search
03/10/2025 Allen M. Jacobs, DPM
NYCPM Medilaw Club and Touro Law Club Discuss Malpractice Case (Ivar E. Roth, DPM, MPH)
Howard Smith is a retired gynecologist who regularly publishes on issues of malpractice. Dr. Roth tells us that he has reviewed numerous malpractice cases in which it was his opinion that unnecessary or poorly performed surgeries were the basis of malpractice claims. Every malpractice case must have a signed attestation of malpractice in some form by a healthcare provider, typically a podiatrist in podiatric malpractice cases. Dr. Smith provided some interesting data to consider, albeit all malpractice claims not just podiatric.
Consider the following noted by Dr. Smith: There are 85,000 malpractice cases filed every year. Of these, 56,000 are summarily dropped. 28,000 are settled. 300 are plaintiff verdicts. Therefore, only 1/3 of the 85,000 filed lawsuits are POTENTIALLY meritorious. 2/3 of the suits filed are frivolous. Yet, to file that suit, some so- called "expert" agreed the case was meritorious and advised the plaintiff lawyer as such. and signed a certificate of merit. Remember, without an expert witness there is no malpractice case (with rare exceptions in some states such as res ipsa cases").
In 42% of the cases, a subsequent treating doctor told the patient that the prior treating doctor was negligent. In 71% of the cases the plaintiff testimony was that a subsequent treating doctor implied malpractice.
Unnecessary surgery is situational in medicine. Are breast implants for cosmesis really a necessary surgery? Is surgery for an asymptomatic bunion deformity necessary? On average, in general medicine, is has been suggested that unnecessary surgeries average 30%. This is not a podiatry centric problem. Many studies suggest that unnecessary spinal fusion surgeries or knee arthroscopic surgeries are common examples. Avoiding unnecessary surgery is the most pragmatic way to avoid surgical complications.
Ultimately, the decision to undergo surgery is made by the patient. That decision should be based on truthful discussions with the patient, remembering that autonomy if the first and basic principle of medical ethics. Do not let hindsight bias and his friends shoulda, coulda, woulda allow creeping determinism to influence your evaluation of prior care.
Sir William Osler taught us over 100 years ago (no, I was not there personally), "medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability". Remember that when you pass judgement on the work of others that you have been asked to evaluate.
Allen M. Jacobs, DPM, St. Louis, MO
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|