


|
|
|
|
Search
02/10/2025 Joseph Borreggine, DPM
MIS Now Out of the Shadows
I recently attended the SAM meeting in Orlando. During the meeting, there was a track of lectures that was dedicated to MIS or minimal incision surgery. I found it quite interesting that MIS has come out of the shadows as a “new thing” in podiatry. There were numerous lectures on a number of MIS procedures from bunion and hammertoe correction to correcting Charcot foot (including using external frames).There were a number of speakers who were well-respected peers in the foot and ankle surgical field who spoke on their expertise regarding the advantages of using MIS versus traditional open procedures.
This is not a new debate in podiatry and has been around since the 1960s but never gained traction in the profession because the MIS foot surgeons were considered the “charlatans” of our time who were untrained and just trying to make a quick buck using the same CPT codes only relegated to the traditional procedures used only by “real” foot surgeons.
The traditional surgeon demographic, podiatric surgical boards, other professional associations opined that this was not fair. That a well trained podiatric surgeon could never be compared to a poorly trained “matter of fact” “fake” foot surgeon. Let alone make the same amount of money. So, as podiatry does and will always do. It cannibalized itself for the good of the profession.
MIS surgeons were continually chastised and bastardized by our residency trained colleagues on staff at hospitals as “lesser than” and “no good” to the profession. The Ambulatory Board of Podiatric Surgery which was the surgical board for MIS was dismantled and dissolved because of non- acceptance by the profession.
Yes, it is true that the infamous podiatrist, Seymour Kessler, DPM in Chicago back in the 1970’s and 80’s was singled out as the top “crack pot” in podiatry who was a “minimal incision zipper” who had numerous lawsuits against him.
This fueled by podiatric “experts” who worked for lawyers testifying against MIS podiatrists and by an investigative report from a Chicago TV news station on “bad outcomes” that patients claimed were a result of his MIS procedures. This did nothing, but add fuel to the fire to destroy the reputation of any podiatrist performing MIS (or affiliated with Dr. Kessler) at the time and rid this type of surgery from podiatry forever.
So, as time passed memories must have faded and MIS began its slow resurgence back into the profession. I find it interesting that this profession has short term memory of what it did to our MIS colleagues and now how we have embraced the MIS techniques as innovative standard of care and technologically advanced form of surgical treatment in the podiatric profession.
But, as things go, things circle back around but not always in the same version as it once was, but rather “new and improved”. There were many a DPM back in the day that were considered just like Copernicus or Lister who were criticized and shunned, but some how their theories of the truth became an accepted reality as time progressed. They are now considered heroes rather than the “insane people” everyone thought they were. The same holds true for the pioneers of MIS.
What is different? Well, let’s look at that. The American Board of Foot and Ankle Surgery accepts these MIS surgical procedures as submitted cases as prerequisite along with traditional foot and ankle surgical cases for getting certification, MIS cases are performed in the hospital with all the equipment that once hidden away in podiatry offices, podiatry residencies are teaching these techniques as “new” procedures in the podiatric surgical arena, there is literature supporting outcomes, and finally let’s follow the money. Yes, “the money”. Surgical supply vendors saw an opportunity and grabbed it by the horns. They created surgical instruments, hardware, and techniques to performed said MIS surgery all in the name of money.
So, let’s go back to the 70’s a moment and fast forward 50 years later to advertising the advantages of MIS, “Small incision, no casts, no pins, and walk right away!!”. Words that made us cringe back then are now the accepted verbiage of the foot and ankle surgeons today. A lesson learned for sure. Never forget the past because it creates the present and ultimately the future good, bad or indifferent.
Joseph Borreggine, DPM, Fort Myers, FL
Other messages in this thread:
02/11/2025 Mark Hinkes, DPM
MIS Now Out of the Shadows (Joseph Borreggine, DPM)
As a traditionally trained podiatrist who was taught "open" foot surgery procedures in my residency, I remember hearing about MIS foot surgery procedures and wondering if adding those procedures to my armamentarium would be of value to my patients. To learn more about MIS foot surgery techniques, I traveled to New York with a colleague to attend a course taught by Edwin Probber, DPM.
About 6 podiatrists sat in a room in the back of his office we affectionately called “the bunker" and watched Dr. Prober via closed circuit TV perform MIS procedures. What I saw was both frightening and amazing at the same time. There was a lot of head shaking going on. I asked myself, how could he do this without destroying vital structures in the foot that could not be seen while doing these procedures? I remember being taught not to place a blade in a place that I could not directly see it. MIS foot surgery challenged all of what I had been taught and learned about traditional "open" surgical procedures. I did not have the opportunity to see any long-term results from these procedures, so I felt I was only exposed to half of the world of MIS foot surgery. I had heard of the botched cases and was concerned about this, always wanting the best post-op results for my patients. There were some aspects of how Dr. Probber interacted with his patients that I disagreed with philosophically, nevertheless it was the technique I wanted to learn more about.
After witnessing all that happened in my visit to Dr. Probber's office, I left with more questions than answers. Knowing that MIS type procedures have been employed by other surgeons on other parts of the human body gave me enough confidence to read and learn more about them. After acquiring what I felt was enough knowledge, I started to employ MIS procedures in selected cases that I felt competent in performing. My results were excellent and I was happy that I took the time to learn about them.
The lesson I learned was to be open-minded about new techniques and to have the ability to personally challenge myself to be a better podiatrist.
Mark Hinkes, DPM, Nashville, TN
|
|
|
|
|