


|
|
|
|
|
Search
12/09/2024 Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD
“I Have Built a Monument More Lasting than Bronze…” ( Allen M. Jacobs, DPM)
I was extremely edified reading Dr. Jacobs’ response to my editorial titled, “I have Built a Monument more Lasting than Bronze.” I wish more of the silent majority would join Dr. Jacobs and myself. It is very edifying to see that we are on the same page when the question of board certification is posited. While reading Dr. Jacobs’ response I could not help thinking about the play by Samuel Beckett, “Waiting for Godot.” It was voted the most significant English language play of the 20th century. It is the perfect example of existential absurdist theater defying interpretation but like all good literature personal interpretation is encouraged, and as it applies to the number of certifying boards in podiatry, it is textbook. It is a unspoiled version of tragic comedy, and an existential metaphor for the present certification problem. Should ABFAS refuse to compromise, it is like a kid taking his football and going home. If ABPM digs in it heels, and doesn’t compromise, we will be at the conclusion of “Waiting for Godot.”
Two individuals named Estragon (Gogo) and Vladimir (Didi) are found on a barren set, except for a single leafless tree in Act I. They banter angrily and discuss life and nothing in particular while they wait for Godot who never arrives. A young boy appears on set informing the two actors that Godot will not be coming today, but surely tomorrow. Gogo and Didi have known each other for fifty years but still seem to have a love hate relationship. They agree they will come back tomorrow to wait for Godot’s arrival.
The next day, Act II finds the two actors on the same set except for a few leaves on the tree. Nothing else has changed. Once again after conversing and bickering a young boy appears on set and informs Gogo and Didi that Godot will not be coming today either, but surely tomorrow. The two men are angered and agree they should hang themselves from the single tree using Gogo’s belt. Gogo removes the belt from his pants. Gogo’s pants fall as the two actors remain motionless. The lights go down and the curtain closes as the play ends.
The play is reminiscent of Camus’ “Myth of Sisyphus.” Both are tragic comedies where one is forced to laugh at the absurdity of the human condition and the futility of what we are trying to accomplish. In Camus’ essay, Sisyphus spends all eternity rolling a large rock up a hill only to see it roll back down as he nears the pinnacle. The absurdity of the two literary works runs parallel to what we are facing right now with the two board versus the single board question. The question has been on the back burner, but it will soon be brought to the front and the heat turned up. Of course, both parties think they are correct. To have two correct answers to this dilemma is not possible.
At the end of the play, the suicide fails, pants are down and although the actors agree to leave the set, they remain motionless. Does this remind you of anything relevant to the current podiatry condition? Peter Woodthorpe who played Gogo asked Beckett one day while riding in a taxi what the play was about and Beckett replied, “It’s all symbiosis, Peter; it’s symbiosis.” Does art imitate life here or does life imitate art? We have two boards stuck in their own convictions and at the end of the day are motionless, not budging. Sisyphus is frustrated because it’s the same task day after day while Gogo and Didi never get to meet the solution they are waiting for; Godot.
Let’s say there are 15,000 podiatrists in the United States. There could be that many characters in “Waiting for Godot.” There may be 15,000 practitioners named Sisyphus rolling that rock up the mountain in their office and everyone has the answer as to when Godot will show up or how to finally crest the mountain top. Why can’t we work together as a profession to solve the certification problem? Is everyone an independent contractor or do we fall into just two stubborn verklempt camps?
We keep comparing ourselves to orthopedic surgeons. As Dr. Jacobs writes, we are more like dentists in what we do and how we do it. This is not to disparage our education and training; I continue to preach we could pass USMLE at the rate MDs and DOs pass. Our curriculum is targeted toward podiatry and the practice of podiatry. Isn’t that ludicrous? No, it’s the way it is for now. But, if we were to sit for USMLE, we would teach to USMLE, take USMLE, then rely on our three year residency and fellowships to teach podiatry. Novel thought. Podiatry schools would be called medical schools, we could change the degree and students would still have to match into podiatry residencies otherwise, there would be no need for podiatry schools. After all, didn’t we all learn more podiatry in our residencies than in podiatry school? Be honest. But those thoughts are for tomorrow when Godot will surely be coming.
In the meantime, that’s not the way it is, and a degree change is going to be a bit more complicated. So, we need to make the most of what we have and how we become certified. We must work together, symbiotically to counter the absurdity. Everyone’s opinion is worth as much as the next podiatrist’s. But we don’t hear about the communities’ solutions. My solution to the degree granted won’t change the board certification process. We still have all those subspecialties under the DPM degree. That’s what we must work with today and tomorrow when Godot will surely come. I’m pretty sure if we don’t work together, Godot will never show up.
Then there will be another tomorrow with no answer from Godot and then another tomorrow until we make what Sartre called the ultimate free choice. We will throw a belt over the tree branch with our pants down around the ankles we have fought so fervently for attempting to hang ourselves. What irony. In one version of the play Gogo and Didi use a rope that continues to break. Their solution? They search for a sturdier rope and will come back tomorrow to hang themselves. Insanity.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s we told people we were reconstructive foot surgeons. Our job was to be instrumental in changing the profession from medical DSCs to surgical DPMs. Maybe we were wrong trying to roll the rock up the hill for everyone with a DPM degree.
Rod Tomczak, DPM, MD, EdD, Columbus, OH
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|
|