|
|
|
Search
02/02/2024 Steven Kravitz, DPM
New PSSD Diagnostic Device (Allen Jacobs, DPM)
I've been following the stream of posts that was originated by Dr. Jacobs regarding PSSD and the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy including the related double crush syndrome.
This device has been a around for many years and the basic principles behind the current application are still the same. Dr. Jacobs' original comments were well stated indicating the controversy that continues with the treatment and that it has not been it has not been accepted into mainstream medicine.
That said, Dr. Roth has interesting comments and there no reason why a practicing physician cannot apply new techniques to their patients as long as they are informed as he indicated especially if out-of-pocket money is required, or there is a lack of solid good evidence in the literature.
I am well aware for the ethical questions brought out previously in the stream of posts. The other aspect brought up by Dr. Jacobs is the cost involved in the equipment, vs. the reimbursement level and probability of not having an ROI that makes sense.
The cost of healthcare keeps increasing. New techniques, though interesting, do not always add to the efficacy of treatment or diagnosis.
There is a red flag here. Scenarios such as this put the provider at a negative cash flow and the tendency to over utilize intentional or otherwise.
Practitioners getting involved in early practice should be very cautious of high price items that have a lot of bells and whistles look attractive and have very good marketing consultants to "sell the goods".
The big lesson here is not just PSSD, but developing practice model that selectively chooses treatments that are efficacious, provide benefit to the patient that otherwise will not be available, and from a practice management standpoint, cost- effective as much as possible.
Steven Kravitz, DPM, Winston-Salem NC area
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|