|
|
|
Search
12/14/2023 Robert D Teitelbaum, DPM
A 40-year Retrospective (David Secord, DPM)
David Secord's posting recently about "allopathic" medicine and how DPM's are allopathic doctors was a great lesson in the real meaning and the corruption of common words that we use to describe our professional status. I would also like to bring up three words that have held us back professionally and consistently for 40 years and I have not seen them much talked about. Those three words are Routine Foot Care.
My thesis is this:
1.There is no complaint about foot pain that is routine. A patient who realizes that her bent 2nd toe has a painful corn on the first joint that hurts in all shoes is in distress. They need someone to counsel them on the choices they may face and the treatments that are relevant. The patient wants our experience, knowledge and ability to communicate. They want a plan of action--in other words they want E/M services. But if something is categorized as 'routine' as in 'trivial' and non-reimbursable, that patient is now a cash patient and their Medicare insurance is useless. The E/M services are fraudulent if Medicare is billed. To me, that is ridiculous, and I am sure I am not alone.
2. There is nothing "routine" about a painful corn or callus. There never was. Something that bothers people is real and if they are going to turn themselves in to the medical establishment which is difficult these days, they don't want to be told they have a trivial and non-reimbursable condition.
3. Is there a symptom or sign that a primary care physician is presented with that is 'routine' in the sense it has been used against podiatrists? The answer is no. Everything has an equal significance as well it should be.
4. The conditions or diseases that justify RFC are mostly arcane and/or never seen in practice and leave out many common conditions that if patients have them---no one would want them to do RFC on themselves (or have non-professionals do it) because it would be dangerous for them. After all, Medicare patients are elderly patients with all that implies. At the back end of life, they are more fragile, less perfused, more neuropathic for many reasons, and more susceptible to infection. Conditions that should be reimbursable, maybe at a lower rate, would be blindness or severe sudden vision problems, spinal arthritis, CVA's (not every jurisdiction allows RFC with anticoagulant therapy), morbid obesity, severe respiratory conditions and arthritis of the dominant hand and Parkinson’s disease.
5. Why do podiatrists have to attest every six months to the status of a disease that hardly ever disappears? While there are some patients who lose the 50 pounds and attain normal blood sugar levels it is pretty rare. And type 1 diabetes is not going away. PAD can be treated and improved and not be limb threatening, but rarely approaches normality. I think this goes back 50 years to when these RFC rules were formulated and Medicare put podiatry and chiropractic in the same basket. And basically we were not to be trusted. A lot has changed since then and the CMS needs to know this.
6. Lastly, how about fear and anxiety. There are many patients who are pathologically afraid to treat any pedal condition. That's an underlying cause of patients who have not gotten care for six or more months -- difficult cases all. An entire pharmaceutical effort exists to treat nervous and anxious patients, who take medications that are often frought with nasty side effects--the doctor visits and drugs are covered by Part D (somewhat), but if they go to a podiatrist with their feet, they are on their own. When it comes to fear, feet don't count. Robert D Teitelbaum, DPM, Naples, FL
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|