|
|
|
Search
09/29/2022 Allen Jacobs, DPM
AACPM Statement on Board Certification (Lawrence Oloff, DPM)
The derisive commentary of Dr. Lee Rogers with regard to the AACPM was the classic straw man argument so often used by politicians rather than academics. I find myself in agreement with Dr. Oloff. The comment was insulting to our profession.
Many of the old podiatrists such as Dr. Oloff, have watched the incredible growth of this profession and concurrently, the increasing acceptance and incorporation of podiatry in medicine. Young practitioners cannot possibly imagine the time past when a podiatrist could not prescribe medications, administer an injection, perform surgery or provide services in a hospital. There was such a time. Or be paid by third parties for their services.
The current state of podiatry came to fruition by the building of education, responsibility, and accountability. We are now trusted to perform significant surgical procedures, participate in limb salvage and wound care with potentially devastating consequences to trusting patients with failure. We think nothing of prescribing or administering any therapy or medication required for management of pathology which we treat. We are accepted by and receive referral of patients from the health care community.
All of this was accomplished in no small manner by demonstrating excellence in patient care and treatment outcomes. We are trusted to determine the school curricula and post graduate training necessary to provide the public with safe and effective care. We are also trusted to determine the requirements for certification in the provision of surgical services. There is a responsibility which attends this to maintain credibility and to assure the public that it may remain confident in their care by a podiatrist.
In my opinion the profession must define those surgical services which a non-ABFAS certified podiatrist may provide. There are many non-ABFAS certified people that I know who are very surgically capable. Once agreed upon, a true standard for ABPM CAQ should be established, rather than a “come join us we are easy” standard. ABFAS must participate in setting this standard. Having established a delineation of accepted privileges in surgery and a legitimate method to assure the capability of those holding an ABPM surgical CAQ, ABFAS and podiatrists in positions credentialing applicants shall support such applicants.
If we fail to do so, I fear our profession will not be trusted to provide safe and effective care, and our growth and autonomy will be threatened. We have enough problems and challenges in today’s health care system. Increasingly NPs, PAs, PCPs, AAFAS, non DPM “would care specialists “, PTs, have been encroaching upon services which we have traditionally provided. There is an old song “nobody does it better “. We must succeed by doing just that. Providing a CAQ with minimal requirements will not serve to do it better.
The accomplished members of the board of ABPM must consider their ultimate responsibility to the public and secondarily to our profession providing ABPM members with a useless CAQ as it now stands serves no one.
Allen Jacobs, DPM, St. Louis, MO
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|