|
|
|
|
Search
05/05/2020 Bryan C. Markinson, DPM
FDA Approves JUBLIA® for Ages 6 and Older
The FDA approval of Jublia in pediatric patients is a good development. In my practice, 90% of patients interested in possible cure (largely clinical) of onychomycosis are treated with systemic therapy and 90% of those are with oral terbinafine. This includes asymptomatic HIV patients and patients who have been cured of Hep C (in consultation with their hepatologist or ID specialist), and children. Terbinafine in children is off label use, but pediatric dosages have been well established. Patients are also informed about important adjunctive measures such as cleaning of shoes, avoidance of barefoot walking, treatment of concomitant tinea pedis (including those they live with), and general good hygiene practices. In 100% of patients in whom I plan to use any FDA approved agent treatment is NOT started until their diagnosis has been laboratory confirmed. In my hospital laboratory, a PAS stain and fungal culture of deep proximal subungual material results in 95% confirmation of dermatophyte infection. All of my treated patients are put on topical anti-fungal cream for life.
Here are some observations:
1) A high percentage of highly motivated patients at the beginning become not highly motivated within three months. Some patients bow out before treatment starts when I am done informing them what they need to do to maximize chances for success.
2) Clinical success or acceptable improvement occurs in a high percentage of patients, especially those with less than 50% of nail involvement
3) In the past 20 years, less than five patients experienced any one of the well published side effects of systemic therapy, none permanent.
4) Non adherence to adjunctive measures after drug therapy stops, results in almost 100% recurrence within 2-3 years.
5) 90% of patient's, when asked if they are adhering to adjunctive measures, respond as follows; "Not as much as I should."
When it comes to FDA approved topical agents, such as Jublia or Kerydin, it is very unfortunate to meet so many patients who have been prescribed these very expensive agents for no other reason than not to worry about systemic side effects. It is undeniable that safety concerns (deserved or not) are the prime driver of the topical antifungal market. It is true however, that we do need to provide an alternative for motivated patients who simply won't take systemic therapy. Along with that, there is a very high percentage of patients who are prescribed these agents (especially by primary care physicians and dermatologists, as well as podiatrists) WITHOUT laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis (depending on insurance requirements). So if failure occurs, we don't know if they are non- responders or even if they have a fungal infection of the nail in the first place. Same is true for oral therapy. We should not be getting laboratory confirmation when insurance requires it, it should be standard of care always.
My concern is that approval of Jublia for use in children will result in a high rate of use without laboratory confirmation of diagnosis, and without diligent explanation of the work involved with adjunctive measures to maximize chances of success, and the need for patience to observe positive results. Safety is of course one important issue, but it should not exclude recognized best practices that enhance success. It is not fair to the patients, and not fair to the drug that ends up declared a failure when it never had a chance.
Bryan C. Markinson, DPM, NY, NY
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|