|
|
|
Search
07/27/2016 Adam Siegel, DPM
What overall grade would you give the Affordable Care Act? (Rich Hofacker. DPM)
I know Dr. Hofacker is being humorous with his rhetorical question about who could possibly could be stupid or high enough to give the ACA a grade A, but I do want to give some insight as to why I am one of those 11 “stupid/high” people who graded it “A.” The question asked simply “What overall grade would you give the Affordable Care Act?” Notice it did not say, “Based upon your experience in private practice, what overall grade…”.
This is an important distinction because I am one of hundreds of thousands of people/patients who view the ACA as a lifesaver. Although the ACA has been a burden on private practice (granted, not enough to grade the ACA an F, which the majority of the readership seemed to have graded it), the program has had considerable benefits to many outside of Podiatry Land.
I was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease 13 years ago at the ripe age of 17. This disease is chronic. There is no cure. As a result, I am on life-long medications to manage my symptoms. One medication, Remicade, has been around since the early 1990’s, but still costs $23,000 per infusion (that is the price my insurance pays, mind you). I have six of these infusions each year. That’s $138,000 per year or $1.8 million since I was diagnosed. This does not even take into account my surgeries, procedures, and other medications.
Thanks to the ACA, there no longer is a lifetime maximum, something that is beneficial to people like me with chronic conditions. In addition, there no longer are pre-existing condition exclusions for private insurances. This exclusion has been a tremendous burden on people, like me, who worry about losing their health insurance through no fault of their own. Does the ACA have its problems? Of course it does, but we as practitioners must remember that there is more to life than practice revenue and politics.
Adam Siegel, DPM, Chicago, IL
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|