|
|
|
Search
03/23/2016 Lawrence Kosova, DPM
Medicare X-Ray Reimbursement Cuts on the Horizon (Raymond F Posa, MBA)
Mr. Posa's post is full of misinformation. The truth is that a CR image is still considered closest to film quality, (especially an auto- load CR) and the expense of having a DR system is truly significant. Many doctors who have purchased a DR have gradually seen their image quality decrease with continued x-ray radiation, requiring regular expensive annual recalibration and finding themselves in a situation where they again need to upgrade or replace within as early as 5 years. This recalibration process is done via software where it is determined which sensors or pixels have gone bad and blanks out the damaged area, rather than having holes or unreadable information, masking and smoothing it over resulting in missing information. A DR system is also much more costly with expensive installation charges requiring modification to your existing x-ray by a state certified technician, annual calibration (with annual support fees of $1000 - $2,000 per year), and as mentioned…gradual image degradation clearly noticeable within 5 years. The only real expense of a CR would be where the phosphor imaging plates used with manual load CR systems can be damaged with mishandling, depending on how careful the technician is...however an auto-load CR system eliminates this problem. The processing time for an auto-load CR is about 30 seconds to obtain an image, and about another 30 seconds for erasure, resulting in a total processing time of about 1 minute. The 7% payment reduction only involves Medicare going into effect next year, with 6 years later in 2023 proposed to 10%. However the estimated loss in revenue will in no way cover the additional expense for a small office to convert to DR for the reasons mentioned above. The only other reason I can think why the government has included CR in reimbursement reduction, (other than from outside special interests) might be the disposal of used plates containing Phosphor, but they can be recycled. This is just another way the small office practitioner is being hit with continuous government reduction in income. Hopefully, when the new regime takes office next year, and pressure from medical organizations....smarter minds will persevere.
Lawrence Kosova, DPM, Chicago, IL
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|