|
|
|
Search
03/26/2014 Keith Sklar, DPM
Has Laser Nail Fungus Removal Been Proven Effective? (Leonard A. Levy, DPM MPH)
The question asked, “Has Laser Nail Fungus Removal Been Proven Effective?” I think this is a confusing question. The question should be, “Does the Laser play an effective part in clearing dystrophic nails?” In my experience, the answer is a definitive YES. I have treated hundreds of patients with my laser and have achieved impressive results.
In a previous post, I shared my experience on the treatment of dystrophic nails. The laser is only a part of my treatment plan to clear and maintain a healthier nail plate. My treatment plan includes the following: (1) Laser treatment, (2) Educating the patient on fungal prevention and how to reduce risk of reinfection, (3) Application of topical anti-fungals, and (4) Possible use of oral anti- fungals.
It seems that the laser gets a bad rap, however, if used properly it’s a very effective tool. It’s only effective though if the doctor providing the care is passionate and thorough, which I am. My treatment protocol and my findings have consistently shown results you can see. I’ve posted these results on my website.
Podiatric pathologies (bunions, heel pain, warts, etc.) are not cured in one visit or by one treatment application. All pathologies require a treatment plan. So why do you expect the use of a laser for the treatment of onychomycosis to be so immediate and perfect? As I stated on a previous post, it took me 20 years to become a good podiatrist. How can someone expect to be great with a laser within his or her first year? It takes roughly a year to see your first results. It will then take another 2 to 3 years to modify your treatment protocol, and then a few more to perfect them.
Keith Sklar, DPM, Schaumburg, IL, keithsklar@footfirst.com
Other messages in this thread:
03/28/2014 Bryan C. Markinson, DPM
Has Laser Nail Fungus Removal Been Proven Effective? (Leonard A. Levy, DPM MPH)
The interesting thread in all of the responses to Dr. Levy's original query is that podiatry does not demand data when it comes to this treatment. I was present when Dr. Elewski delivered her results of an ND Yag laser treatment for onychomycosis (the study cited in the Times) and have discussed it with her personally over the past two years at the Council for Nail Disorders Meeting.
In a nutshell, this is what Dr. Elewski's study documented: It takes 50 degrees centigrade to kill dermatophytes. Human subjects in her study could not tolerate anything over 41 degrees. Her conclusion was that the laser therefore was not killing the fungus. She reiterated this at this year's meeting last week in a comment regarding another presentation on the subject. This was about a specific ND Yag wavelength laser, and not all lasers.
The second part of the problem is the initial marketing of laser therapy to the public by the podiatry profession, unchecked by the manufacturers who claimed they could not control what podiatrists advertise. Simply stated, for the vast majority of the plethora of radio and print advertising for the technology , the public could not come away with any other impression that laser was a one treatment ZAP cure forever. This is what may just have killed the technology for this indication. Add in the amount of podiatrists who beleive they don't need confirmatory lab tests to document the infection, and you have the perfect storm for labeling the technology as a failure.
I encourage all podiatrists to look at the data on non-thermal laser therapy for onychomycosis, for which the Noveon has published peer reviewed data which Dr. Levy asked for.
Disclosure: I am a consultant to Nomir Medical, maker's of the Noveon.
Bryan C. Markinson, DPM, NY, NY, bryan.markinson@mountsinai.org
|
|
|
|