|
|
|
Search
03/04/2014 Michael DeVito, DPM
Technology May Put Private Practice Into Extinction (Joseph Borreggine, DPM)
I very much feel similar to Dr. Borreggine, so much so that I went to the e-advocacy on APMA and sent letters to my congressman about the legislation requesting hardship exemption from EHR penalty for small practices. Hopefully, others will do the same, everyday until they hear us. I never felt specialists should be reporting the same as PCPs/internists. If the reporting was more tailored to our needs, it would be easier take all of this. I may be incorrect, but have been told stage 2 MU has significant hurdles to overcome including costs for encryption and additional costs for Patient education from a “certified vendor.” It was not enough that my patient Education sheets had to be reconfigured in the EMR and then reprinted to hand to a patient to get credit, but now we have to pay someone else to get certified education material. There are good things about our new found EHR technology but there are many things that are slowly destroying the small private practice and the quality care they deliver because of the impossibility to keep up. It is not just the doctors that are bogged down, the entire staff is glued to their computers clicking and verifying and checking all the measures to meet meaningless uselessness. When you add it all up it is not worth the toll it is taking on the office.
I know many have said it is not about the financial incentives, rather about providing better quality care. Let’s take our next poll to see if Doctors feel they provide better care in this MU world created. The MU process needs streamlined and improved as it is out of control. Next time your internet goes out, turn off all the computers get back to the basics and think about how nice it was providing care without the reporting & EMR technology around. The proposed new SGR formula says they are likely eliminating meaningful use and PQRS reporting (not soon enough). It is quite clear we did not realize the detail of reporting and the resources required for these next stages. If we abandon MU after 2 phases of stage 1 and give up now what happens? Will penalties carry over to the new payment system or will things be adjusted? What is in Stage 3? Maybe they don’t want us to know because we would all abandon it now before dragging this out 3 more painful years.
I understand the need for ICD-10 and even the PQRS reports with a few measures here and there, but the MU reporting program was not well thought out for small physician practices and is completely impractical. And when you combine them all, at the same time, in the same year, (when even your software vendors can’t keep up with all the changes), we cry uncle. I for one don’t care anymore about the threats of the 5% penalty, I’ll use the EMR the way it works for me. Maybe this was the intention all along to narrow the networks and get Doctors to drop out of the Medicare system by punishing them 2% here for eRx, then 2% there for PQRS and bam another 5% for MU. Who in medicine agreed to this nonsense? We will wake up one day and ask what happened to all the good doctors in private practice? They were knocked out by the 1,2,3 punches of an American healthcare system caught up in reporting and not caring for patients. Michael DeVito, DPM, Chicago Ridge, IL, Drd@devitofootdoc.com
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|