|
|
|
Search
02/03/2014 Michael Forman, DPM
Elimination of RFC Patients (Simon Young, DPM)
Again I agree with Dr. Simon Young - this time in reference to "routine" and "at-risk" foot care. This service is in the domain of the podiatrist and that is where it should stay. I can accept healthy patients seeing a pedicurist if they choose, however all "at risk" patients must be seen in a podiatry office.
It is wonderful that so many of our colleagues are so busy that they don't want to bother with this type of patient. This is the patient who needs us the most. I have several podiatric colleagues who do only foot and ankle surgery. That's great and speaks well of our profession. Many of our three year resident graduate choose not to do conservative care. That certainly is their choice.
I see another avenue for the rest of us. I feel that podiatry is in the same place that dentistry was in fifty years ago when dentists performed their own oral prophylaxis. Not so today. Dentists employ dental assistants dental hygienist, and a new super assistant who is trained to do restorations.
It is time for podiatry to catch up. I employ two assistants who I have trained to do conservative care. They are artists who do the best "CNC" that I have ever seen (without blood letting). They don't make diagnoses. They trim toenails and keratomas under our direction. One of our doctors ALWAYS sees the patient, sometimes twice during the visit. particularly at the end of the visit. Approximately 20% of these patients will complain of another problem which is addressed at that time. This is what keeps our practice busy. Ohio specifically states in the revised code that an assistant can perform any task if they are properly trained, capable of successfully performing the duty, and under the direct supervision of a physician.
I believe the majority of podiatrists should have full service practices that offer the gamut of foot and ankle care. Let's keep foot care in our field.
Michael Forman, DPM, Cleveland, OH, im4man@aol.com
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|