|
|
|
Search
05/10/2013 William A Sachs, DPM
Letter to Gov. Christie About ESWT Coverage
I recently had a former patient return to see me. I had performed ESWT 10 years ago. She began to tell me how great the procedure had been and that she has been pain free for all these years. She remarked that she heard "it's not covered anymore" and she's so happy she was able to have it covered at that time because it really "made a difference" in her life. It prompted me to write this letter to Governor Christie. My hope is that others will take the time to write a letter to their government officials in the hope that there may be some transparency and maybe some action taken to allow us to better serve our patients.
Dear Governor Christie,
I have been in practice for 30 years, and during that time, insurance reimbursement has declined more than 50%, while inflation, supply costs, office salaries, rent and liability insurance have continued to rise.
Can you imagine if salaries to government workers would have steadily declined during that period of time? I’m sure the quality of government employee and government services would decline, or stop altogether!
One issue I wish to bring to your attention is the policy of insurance companies to decline services which are cutting edge and allow people to recover faster without significant side- effects or disability.
I would hope this would pique your interest because these procedures are minimally invasive and allow patients to get back to work sooner. This allows for less time out of work and less time collecting disability!
The procedures I refer to are called ESWT (extracorporeal shockwave therapy) and PRP (platelet rich plasma). They are used for chronic tendonitis, including plantar fasciitis and Achilles tendonitis. These procedures are extremely effective, have been in use for more than 10 years and are FDA-approved.
Ironically, Horizon Blue Cross covered these services 10 years ago but then decided they are, in their terms “experimental and investigational”. Or in the simplest of terms…. Too many people are opting for this simple solution and it is having an adverse effect on our bottom line! There is nothing experimental or investigational about it. They are FDA-approved procedures with thousands of patients that are now pain free.
I appreciate that you are a no “BS” guy. But the policies of these insurance carriers are pure “BS”. Patients pay exorbitant premiums for what they think is the ability to have quality healthcare. This includes having accessibility to the best trained doctors utilizing the latest and most effective treatment modalities. Clearly, these opportunities are not always available due to the insurance company’s bottom line.
I am hoping this may shed some light on a very frustrating state of affairs. I realize this may be a very small part of the problem but your attention would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your attention.
Respectfully,
William A Sachs, DPM, Toms River, NJ, wmasachs@gmail.com
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|