|
|
|
Search
05/02/2013 Kenneth Meisler, DPM
Purchasing a Digital X-Ray System (Michael Brody, DPM)
After 30 years in the same office, I moved to a new much larger office in 2007. I decided to switch to digital x-rays and go totally paperless with EMR at that time. EMR was relatively easy, digital x-rays was EXTREMELY easy.
I disagree with Dr. Brody recommending a CR system for digital x-rays. In 2007, I tried to save some money and bought one of the most popular podiatry CR systems. After one year I realized the quality of the images were not acceptable. I upgraded to a 20/20 CR system and it was a definite improvement (I sold my first CR for almost what I paid for it). I used the 20/20 CR system very frequently in my office which has 3-4 podiatrists at a time. By that point, the 20/20 DR images were much better than the CR images and I also noticed some degradation of the quality of my CR image over time. When I added in the increased speed of 20/20's DR system I knew I had to upgrade again. DR image quality is excellent and the images are almost instantaneous There is no noticeable degradation because there are no moving parts. 20/20 has not had a single unit returned broken because someone dropped it. I think buying a CR system is like getting an 8 track tape, you can listen to music but it is very outdated and will wear out. Most importantly you need the best quality image when looking for small fractures, osteochondral lesions, stress fractures etc. You will be able to practice better with quality images of a good DR system., Especially in a few years when your CR system images start to degrade. In my opinion, Digital x-rays pay for themselves by 1. Making you feel better about yourself and your practice. 2. Impressing patients, they are still amazed by it and many come in saying “I can’t believe my other doctor didn’t have that” 3. Many hours a month saved pulling x-rays if your are paperless and if you aren’t you should be. 4.you never lose an x-ray 5. It is easy to e mail X rays to colleagues or radiologists for second opinions. 6. X-rays are NEVER out of order. You can easily follow the healing of an osteotomy or fracture. As compared to finding the X rays in a folder out of order and having to search through them to put them in date order in front of the patient. 7. Savings in space for a developer and x ray storage. 8.The staff loves it.
Do not skimp on your x-ray system. It is probably the most important piece of equipment in your office, buy the best you can! Too many podiatrist drive BMW’s but skimp on their x-rays. I drive a Prius but have the BEST podiatry digital x-ray system. My digital x-ray system has helped grow my practice!
Disclosure: Dr. Meisler is a paid consultant for 20/20 Imaging. Kenneth Meisler, DPM, NY, NY, Kenmeisler@gmail.com
Other messages in this thread:
05/04/2013 Raymond Posa, MBA
RE: Purchasing a Digital X-Ray System (Michael Brody, DPM)
Regarding Dr. Brody’s post on digital x-ray systems CR vs. DR, there are some erroneous statements. First CR is not a “true” digital system. Think of CR as a copy machine, we all know as you copy originals, you lose quality. The CR system is more closely related to traditional film than it is to digital x-ray. In a CR system, a x-ray sensitive plate is put inside a standard x-ray cassette and exposed just like a traditional piece of film would be. Then the cassette is placed into a reader (some CR systems require you to remove the plate from the cassette and place it into a reader. The image is then scanned off the plate and converted to a digital image. The process is somewhat labor intensive and slow. In a DR system the image is taken directly from the imager to the PC, thus eliminating the need to handle cassettes and the need to convert an analog picture to a digital image. I ran a time motion study using a mid-range CR system ($75,000) vs. a 21 megapixel DR system ($25,000) and the speed difference in both the image acquisition and the positioning of the patient and the handling of the cassettes resulted in a 3 to 1 time savings by using DR. The time motion study showed it took just over 6 minutes to take 3 images in a study, process them and get them on the computer screen with the CR unit, the DR only took 1 minute and 56 seconds. In a busy office this productivity gain is significant. As for cost, most companies are dropping their CR products because they are yesterday’s technology. As for cost, there are some digital x-ray companies that do not charge ongoing maintenance support for the unit or their software.
I have seen many more CR plates damaged than any DR plate. The CR plates typically cost $800 each and you need to keep about 6 on hand to operate efficiently. With all of the handling and the lifting and the dropping and the banging, these CR plates get damaged frequently. The CR plates also have a limited life span (about 800 images) the image quality also drops significantly as you approach the end of life of the plate. With the DR system, you are never lifting the imager, rather you rotate it from a horizontal to a vertical position and the unit never leave contact with the ground.
Finally, ask your x-ray dealer about the section 179 and ADA tax credits available on the DR units, they generally off set have of the cost of the unit. Raymond F. Posa, MBA – Farmingdale, NJ rposa@themantagroup.com
|
|
|
|