Spacer
CuraltaAS324
Spacer
PresentBannerCU624
Spacer
PMbannerE7-913.jpg
MidmarkFX724
Podiatry Management Online


Facebook

Podiatry Management Online
Podiatry Management Online



AmerXGY724

Search

 
Search Results Details
Back To List Of Search Results

04/21/2012    

RESPONSES / COMMENTS (MEDICAL/LEGAL )


RE: Sterilizing Bits Between Debridements (Jeff Kittay, DPM)

From: Elliot Udell, DPM



The most serious public health concern associated with burring mycotic nails is the infectious aerosol that is projected into the air. If you go on to Pub Med and type in "nail dust", you will see numerous papers published in the US and the UK on this occupational hazard. The health risk is not only to podiatrists, but to podiatric assistants and probably to patients because some of the studies indicate that the infectious nail dust aerosol remains in the air for a half hour or more after infected nails are drilled.



Surveys of podiatrists taken in this country as well as in the UK have shown that a statistically significant number of our colleagues who routinely drill nails have developed a host of pulmonary problems associated with this practice. There may even be OSHA regulations which restrict the use of a room for a period of time after mycotic nails have been burred.

 

I have not burred any nails in my practice. On rare occasions, a patient will say to me "Doc, why don't you drill my toe nails? The podiatrist down the block does." When this happens, I show the patient the literature and gently say, "Mrs. Jones, if I burr nails, not only will you be breathing in your own nail dust, but the infected dust of every other patient whose nails were burred in this office this morning." In most cases, this is well understood and appreciated.

 

Elliot Udell, DPM, Hicksville, NY, Elliotu@aol.com


Other messages in this thread:


05/22/2012    

RESPONSES / COMMENTS (MEDICAL/LEGAL )


RE: Shredding Documents (Frank Lattarulo, DPM)

From: Michael Brody, DPM



I recommend using a shredding company that brings a shredding truck to your office. You watch them shred the documents and then receive a manifest. There are many companies that offer such services.



Michael Brody, DPM, Commack, NY, mbrody@tldsystems.com


05/17/2012    

RESPONSES / COMMENTS (MEDICAL/LEGAL )


RE: Billing Under an Associate's Insurance Number (Yaron Raducanu, DPM)

From : Paul Kesselman, DPM



Dr. Raducanu rightly points out that one cannot bill under another's name and should not ever bill under another's name unless the other doctor is actually present. I would take it three steps further:

1) You should agree that the services billed were actually performed;

2) The services were documented.

3) You can sleep at night knowing your signature is on that chart.



There are arrangements where one can have the payments re-assigned to another tax identifier. Under this arrangement, only the party who bills the service must have performed the service and actually signed the chart. However, this is usually done when an employed podiatrist renders the service and the employer/employee arrangement is for the employer to receive payment, because the employee is salaried. The arrangement originally posed here is just the opposite. I agree that the employed podiatrist should seek legal counsel prior to agreeing to the proposed arrangement.



Paul Kesselman, DPM, Woodside, NY, pkesselman@pol.net



Editor's Note: Dr. Raducanu now practices in Philadelphia, PA


04/12/2012    

RESPONSES / COMMENTS (MEDICAL/LEGAL )


RE: Service Dog (James Lucarelli, DPM)

From: Richard A. Simmons, DPM



The U.S. Department of Justice clarified many of the rules concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act. This became effective March 15, 2011 and can be found here.



Concerning service dogs: “A public accommodation shall not ask about the nature or extent of a person's disability, but may make two inquiries to determine whether an animal qualifies as a service animal. A public accommodation may ask if the animal is required because of a disability and what work or task the animal has been trained to perform. A public accommodation shall not...



Editor's Note: Dr. Simmons' extended-length note can be read here.


11/28/2011    

RESPONSES / COMMENTS (MEDICAL/LEGAL )


RE: Service Dogs (John Moglia, DPM)


From:  Richard A. Simmons, DPM


 


As the handler of a service dog for many years, I have interest in this topic. The document, “Changes to ADA affecting Service Animals, Effective March 15, 2011” basically limits “service animal” to be any breed of dog and miniature horses. What is important for a doctor’s office is that the office is considered a public accommodation. From the document is the following: “A public accommodation shall not ask about the nature or extent of a person's disability, but may make two inquiries to determine whether an animal qualifies as a service animal. A public accommodation may ask if the animal is required because of a disability and what work or task the animal has been trained to perform. A public accommodation shall not require documentation, such as proof that the animal has been certified, trained, or licensed as a service animal.”


 


In the situation presented, the office was correct because: “The work or tasks performed by a service animal must be directly related to the handler's disability.” and “A service animal shall be under the control of its handler.” That is, in this situation, the service animal was not being handled by the person with the disability and no accommodation is required.


 


Richard A. Simmons, DPM, Rockledge, FL, RASDPM32955@gmail.com
StablePowerstep?121


Our privacy policy has changed.
Click HERE to read it!