|
|
|
Search
09/27/2018 Name Withheld
Fraudulent Billing of CPT 11305, 11306 and 11307
I am an RN with 25 years of O.R. experience working with orthopedic and podiatric surgeons and I work part time for a DPM. I’m also a certified coder and fully understand proper billing practices. I make a majority of my income as an outside consultant for many insurance companies when there is suspected fraud. The past two years have been keeping me busy reviewing literally thousands of claims for procedure codes CPT 11305, 11306 and 11307 billed by DPMs.
I have reviewed thousands of these claims with a committee which includes two DPMs and a dermatologist. Over the past two years, we did not review a single claim sent by a DPM where the code was justified. These codes are for a shave of a lesion and they are being used incorrectly. The code is to shave remove a lesion such as a nevus or suspected lesion and should require local injectable anesthesia and a specimen for biopsy.
This code is NOT a procedure that should be billed every 61 days, etc., and a procedure that should NOT be billed for keratotic lesions, IPKs, porokeratoses or calluses. You can get as creative as you’d like but it’s called fraud. Unless you are using an injectable local anesthetic, and shaving a lesion to remove the lesion and send for biopsy, you are likely dancing on thin ice. Trimming a keratotic lesion or “shaving” an IPK should be billed as a CPT 11055/11056/11057.
Getting creative to get paid for a high paying code is fraudulent and the insurers are scrutinizing these claims. One large company is so fed up with the abuse, they are considering having to have these codes pre-authorized. If you’re simply trimming keratotic lesions or IPKs and billing these codes, I urge you to stop, unless you’d like to be like two DPMs who now each owe over $300,000 back to the insurer with significant other consequences.
Name Withheld
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|