| 
 |  
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |  
	Search
 
 
 
06/04/2018    Name Withheld 1
  
The High Cost of ABFAS Certification
  
Much like Name Withheld, I also wish to remain  anonymous for fear of incurring the wrath of  ABFAS, which carries far too much power over our  career progression. I failed the case review for  RRA this year and the justification provided was  ridiculous, arbitrary and in just about every case  flat out wrong, which suggests to me my cases  weren't actually reviewed with any degree of  scrutiny. Unfortunately, we have no recourse  other than "you still have 2 more years of  eligibility so try again next year."
  It's well known among my colleagues that it's a  scam and you'll pass in your 6th or 7th year. If  ABFAS was concerned about quality of its  diplomates, the case review would be more of a  formality and would have a very high first time  pass rate. There are excellent foot and ankle  surgeons doing very high quality work that are  being held back by ABFAS for no purpose other than  they can pay the fees again next year. This could  easily be considered restriction of trade and I  wonder to what extent the APMA is monitoring the  rapidly growing discontent with ABFAS. 
  I keep seeing doctors complaining about the low  pass rate for ABFAS certification, and to me it’s  part of a bigger problem. Board certification is  not a “participation trophy”. You don’t get it  because you tried hard or paid a lot of money for  school. It is there to set doctors apart. It  should be hard. The pass rate should be low. We  should hold ourselves to a higher standard. It’s a  surgical board. Not all MD and DOs are surgeons,  not all DPMs should be surgeons either. That’s a  big part of why we are fighting a battle in many  locations for surgical privileges, years ago,  everyone was equal, and some of those DPMs should  not have been operating. But that has been the  stigma that plagues podiatry. 
  The MD/DO who pictures us as podiatrists doing  surgeries that we should not be doing, or not  doing them well, or simply having repeated bad  outcomes. This is part of why we fight for scope  and privileges in parts of this country still.  Some of us are meant to be medical/biomechanical  experts, not surgeons. I do believe the  examination system is horrible. The computerized  examination should go away and go back to oral  exams. But that doesn’t mean everyone should pass. 
  If everyone passes, why does the board  certification exist? Why not just hand all  graduating residents a board certification? We  need something that sets a higher standard than  simply finishing residency, and board  certification is that standard. That’s how we  advance our profession, set a high standard. You  should have to come up to meet a standard, it  should not come to you. 
  Name Wthhheld 2
  
  
 
 There are no more messages in this thread. 
 | 
 
|   | 
 
 
 |  
 
 |