|
|
|
|
Search
03/24/2017 David Zuckerman, DPM
Amnion Injections: Evaluating a Brave New World of Regenerative Sports Medicine
I have read with interest Dr Pearl's article on Amnion injections for degenerative conditions. featured by PM News. There appears to be a false statement that quantifiable long-term outcomes have not been reported with ESWT treatments. I have enclosed an abstract by Professor Wang which was done with long-term conclusions outlined.
Below is the portion from Dr. Pearls article indicating that ESWT doesn't have long-term outcome. This is absolutely incorrect. again see just one abstract by Professor Wang.
Quote from Dr. Pearl's Featured Article Amnion injections: "Intrasubstance tears, tendinosis, and mucoid-myxoid degeneration are difficult to treat successfully without involving surgical methods. The current advancements in modern biotechnology have offered options to surgical repair with other minimally invasive techniques that have not provided quantifiable long term outcomes, such as extracorporeal shock wave therapy, radiofrequency-coblation, etc."
ESWT high energy by Dornier and Osstron devices both have shown long-term resolution of plantar fasciosis... here is just one example of a study over a 60-72 months. This is considered long- term. See abstract below. .
Wang et al. (2006) compared results of high- energy ESWT (n = 79 patients, 85 heels) vs. conservative treatment (n=70 patients, 83 heels) for plantar fasciitis. Patients in the shockwave group received 1500 impulses at 16 kV (0.32 mJ/mm 2) in a single session. Patients in the control group received conservative treatment consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, orthotics, physical therapy, an exercise program, and/or a local cortisone injection. Patients were evaluated with a 100 point scoring system with 70 points for pain and 30 points for function.
Before treatment, the groups had no significant differences in the scores for pain and function. The shockwave group was evaluated at 60 to 72 months; the conservative treatment group was evaluated at 34 to 64 months. Overall results for the shockwave group were 69.1% excellent, 13.6% good, 6.2% fair, and 11.1% poor.
Overall results for the control group were 0% excellent, 55% good, 36% fair, and 9% poor. The shockwave group had a recurrence rate of 11%; the control group had a recurrence rate of 55%. There were no systemic or local complications. The study weaknesses include evaluations that were performed at different follow-up times and 70% of the score was subjective.
David Zuckerman, DPM, Cherry Hill, NJ
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|